Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1207720180100040439
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery
2018 Volume.10 No. 4 p.439 ~ p.447
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Foraminal Decompression Using Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis
Kim Ju-Eun

Choi Dae-Jung
Park Eu-Gene J.
Abstract
Background: Since open Wiltse approach allows limited visualization for foraminal stenosis leading to an incomplete decompression, we report the short-term clinical and radiological results of unilateral biportal endoscopic foraminal decompression using 0¡Æ or 30¡Æ endoscopy with better visualization.

Methods: We examined 31 patients that underwent surgery for neurological symptoms due to lumbar foraminal stenosis which was refractory to 6 weeks of conservative treatment. All 31 patients underwent unilateral biportal endoscopic far-lateral decompression (UBEFLD). One portal was used for viewing purpose, and the other was for surgical instruments. Unilateral foraminotomy was performed under guidance of 0¡Æ or 30¡Æ endoscopy. Clinical outcomes were analyzed using the modified Macnab criteria, Oswestry disability index, and visual analogue scale. Plain radiographs obtained preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively were compared to analyze the intervertebral angle (IVA), dynamic IVA, percentage of slip, dynamic percentage of slip (gap between the percentage of slip on flexion and extension views), slip angle, disc height index (DHI), and foraminal height index (FHI).

Results: The IVA significantly increased from 6.24¡Æ ¡¾ 4.27¡Æ to 6.96¡Æ ¡¾ 3.58¡Æ at 1 year postoperatively (p = 0.306). The dynamic IVA slightly decreased from 6.27¡Æ ¡¾ 3.12¡Æ to 6.04¡Æ ¡¾ 2.41¡Æ, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.375). The percentage of slip was 3.41% ¡¾ 5.24% preoperatively and 6.01% ¡¾ 1.43% at 1-year follow-up (p = 0.227), showing no significant difference. The preoperative dynamic percentage of slip was 2.90% ¡¾ 3.37%; at 1 year postoperatively, it was 3.13% ¡¾ 4.11% (p = 0.720), showing no significant difference. The DHI changed from 34.78% ¡¾ 9.54% preoperatively to 35.05% ¡¾ 8.83% postoperatively, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.837). In addition, the FHI slightly decreased from 55.15% ¡¾ 9.45% preoperatively to 54.56% ¡¾ 9.86% postoperatively, but the results were not statistically significant (p = 0.705).

Conclusions: UBEFLD using endoscopy showed a satisfactory clinical outcome after 1-year follow-up and did not induce postoperative segmental spinal instability. It could be a feasible alternative to conventional open decompression or fusion surgery for lumbar foraminal stenosis.
KEYWORD
Spinal stenosis, Endoscopic surgical procedure, Minimally invasive surgical procedures, Endoscopy
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information
MEDLINE ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed